Hazem Salah Abu Ismael

Really, but why?DeadGuy said:Hazem Salah Abu Ismael![]()
![]()
Oh really? Me, too!Hazem Salah Abu Ismael![]()
![]()
Why? Cause of his distinguished catchphrase...........Sanahya kherafan.......Really, but why?
That's the reason why I didn't vote for him.Hamdeen Sabbahi
Why? Because of jewels like this video...
Egypt Presidential Candidate Sabahi in 2005: I Support Al-Qaeda When It Kills Americans - YouTube
EXACTLY, the same for Morsy.Oh really? Me, too!
He's a leader. A fair and square kindof guy, and a true intellectual.
/scarcasm
So who did you vote for? and why?That's the reason why I didn't vote for him.
Amr Moosa.So who did you vote for? and why?
Interesting, very!Hamdeen Sabbahi
Why? Because of jewels like this video...
Egypt Presidential Candidate Sabahi in 2005: I Support Al-Qaeda When It Kills Americans - YouTube
Youssef Rakha tells it like it is here:Interesting, very!
Trouble is, if anyone takes a good look into any of the candidates' history (Or present) then they won't vote for any of them.........
Any way, it's a matter of days now before things start going a bit clear.........Or messy :ranger:
boycotting is always an electoral option, and one that's gaining ground given the dismal choice of candidatesInteresting, very!
Trouble is, if anyone takes a good look into any of the candidates' history (Or present) then they won't vote for any of them.........
Any way, it's a matter of days now before things start going a bit clear.........Or messy :ranger:
Color me not politically savvy, but what would be the benefit of a boycott?boycotting is always an electoral option, and one that's gaining ground given the dismal choice of candidates
It's not about benefits, it's about expressing one's views on the entire process and choice. A mass boycott would of course take legitimacy away from the final result, even if there was no fix/fraud.Color me not politically savvy, but what would be the benefit of a boycott?
There won't be better candidates unless we start the process of being a democratic country.boycotting is always an electoral option, and one that's gaining ground given the dismal choice of candidates
Thank you for explaining.It's not about benefits, it's about expressing one's views on the entire process and choice. A mass boycott would of course take legitimacy away from the final result, even if there was no fix/fraud.
On the other hand, if you vote for a candidate who stands no chance you could consider it a matter of principle but you might as well put your ballot paper in the waste bin. 12 candidates standing now, only a couple of them are real contenders.
Agreed!It's not about benefits, it's about expressing one's views on the entire process and choice. A mass boycott would of course take legitimacy away from the final result, even if there was no fix/fraud.
On the other hand, if you vote for a candidate who stands no chance you could consider it a matter of principle but you might as well put your ballot paper in the waste bin. 12 candidates standing now, only a couple of them are real contenders.
Well said :clap2:There won't be better candidates unless we start the process of being a democratic country.
I believe that becoming a president in Egypt was never a dream for any Egyptian and no one in Egypt was raised or was taught enough to be a president.
Everyone of them wants to change Egypt's character because there are no guidelines set for this position. And since there's no constitution, their chance to remodel is higher.
We have to just accept what the first elected president will do and better candidates will come with time.![]()