Expat Forum For People Moving Overseas And Living Abroad banner
1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
7 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hi All,

Firstly, sorry about the long question. I am in urgent need of advise here. Thanks a lot for your help and time, really appreciate that!!

We applied for tourist visa (subclass 600) for my parents as they want to visit us for 6 months. One of them is suffering from CML (blood cancer) and is undergoing treatment with oral medications (only oral tablets, no other treatment). The high commission has responded with 'an invitation to comment' stating that 'THE APPLICANT DOES NOT MEET THE HEALTH REQUIREMENT'. Enclosed are snippets from their response letters*. Can someone please help us with answers for the following questions?

#1) We are going to respond back with a letter stating that we would not be using any medical facilities/pharmacy services/health care in Australia. We will be travelling with the medications required for the period of stay. We will also attach a letter from our doctor confirming these aspects. We will attach receipts showing that we already have purchased the required medications for our travel.
Are these details enough? Do you think we need to add any more details to our response?

#2) Should we consider reducing our stay/visa request from 6 months to 3 months? Given that they have highlighted "You may also consider reducing your stay period" in BOLD, we are wondering if we should make it 3 months.

#3) I am really hoping that the visa will be granted, atleast for 3 months. Anything else that I need to do to ensure that this happens?

*Snippets from their response*

-- Letter 1: IMMI s57 Natural Justice --

Invitation to comment on information for a Visitor (Tourist) (subclass 600) visa
Adverse information : The Department has conducted checks to confirm the information you provided in your previous or current application. During this process we have received unfavourable information which does not support your previous or current application. The results of the medical examination for XYZ (my parent) has been evaluated by a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth (MOC) and has been assessed as not meeting the health requirement for the grant of Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass 600) visa.
......
You are entitled to comment on the report by the MOC, and you may provide supporting evidence for a claim that the report is incorrect. Any comments or evidence you provide will be considered in making a decision on your application. Note: Only evidence of a medical nature such as specialist reports will be sent to the MOC for consideration."You may also consider reducing your stay period". We will in turn forward the information received form you to the MOC for consideration and advice you of the MOC's final determination.

-- Letter 2: 884E – Offshore – DNM – 600 --

FORM 884: OPINION OF A MEDICAL OFFICER OF THE COMMONWEALTH
THE APPLICANT DOES NOT MEET THE HEALTH REQUIREMENT

The applicant has been assessed against Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4005 [see attached extract] for the period of 1 year. The applicant does not satisfy sub-subparagraph PIC 4005(1)©(ii)(A) in Schedule 4 to the Migration Regulations. The applicant is a 52 year old person with: Asymptomatic myeloid leukemia.
Form and severity of the applicant's condition: the applicant has asymptomatic chronic myeloid leukaemia requiring immunomodulator medication. Provision of services to a hypothetical person in Australia with the same condition as the applicant and at the same severity: a hypothetical person in Australia with the same condition as the applicant, at the same severity, would be likely to require ongoing immunomodulator pharmaceuticals. This condition is likely to be Permanent. I consider that a hypothetical person with this disease or condition, at the same severity as the applicant, would be likely to require health care or community services during the period specified above.
These services would be likely to include: Pharmaceuticals
Provision of these health care and/or community services would be likely to result in a significant cost to the Australian community in the areas of health care and/or community services. In preparing this opinion, I have had regard to the information available to date concerning the applicant, including, but not limited to the immigration medical examination and a report from Haematologist <our doctor back home>

-- Letter 3: Extract from migration regulations 1994 --
Unable to post a link, first URL when you google 'Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4005'
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,145 Posts
Hi All,

Firstly, sorry about the long question. I am in urgent need of advise here. Thanks a lot for your help and time, really appreciate that!!

We applied for tourist visa (subclass 600) for my parents as they want to visit us for 6 months. One of them is suffering from CML (blood cancer) and is undergoing treatment with oral medications (only oral tablets, no other treatment). The high commission has responded with 'an invitation to comment' stating that 'THE APPLICANT DOES NOT MEET THE HEALTH REQUIREMENT'. Enclosed are snippets from their response letters*. Can someone please help us with answers for the following questions?

#1) We are going to respond back with a letter stating that we would not be using any medical facilities/pharmacy services/health care in Australia. We will be travelling with the medications required for the period of stay. We will also attach a letter from our doctor confirming these aspects. We will attach receipts showing that we already have purchased the required medications for our travel.
Are these details enough? Do you think we need to add any more details to our response?

#2) Should we consider reducing our stay/visa request from 6 months to 3 months? Given that they have highlighted "You may also consider reducing your stay period" in BOLD, we are wondering if we should make it 3 months.

#3) I am really hoping that the visa will be granted, atleast for 3 months. Anything else that I need to do to ensure that this happens?

*Snippets from their response*

-- Letter 1: IMMI s57 Natural Justice --

Invitation to comment on information for a Visitor (Tourist) (subclass 600) visa
Adverse information : The Department has conducted checks to confirm the information you provided in your previous or current application. During this process we have received unfavourable information which does not support your previous or current application. The results of the medical examination for XYZ (my parent) has been evaluated by a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth (MOC) and has been assessed as not meeting the health requirement for the grant of Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass 600) visa.
......
You are entitled to comment on the report by the MOC, and you may provide supporting evidence for a claim that the report is incorrect. Any comments or evidence you provide will be considered in making a decision on your application. Note: Only evidence of a medical nature such as specialist reports will be sent to the MOC for consideration."You may also consider reducing your stay period". We will in turn forward the information received form you to the MOC for consideration and advice you of the MOC's final determination.

-- Letter 2: 884E – Offshore – DNM – 600 --

FORM 884: OPINION OF A MEDICAL OFFICER OF THE COMMONWEALTH
THE APPLICANT DOES NOT MEET THE HEALTH REQUIREMENT

The applicant has been assessed against Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4005 [see attached extract] for the period of 1 year. The applicant does not satisfy sub-subparagraph PIC 4005(1)©(ii)(A) in Schedule 4 to the Migration Regulations. The applicant is a 52 year old person with: Asymptomatic myeloid leukemia.
Form and severity of the applicant's condition: the applicant has asymptomatic chronic myeloid leukaemia requiring immunomodulator medication. Provision of services to a hypothetical person in Australia with the same condition as the applicant and at the same severity: a hypothetical person in Australia with the same condition as the applicant, at the same severity, would be likely to require ongoing immunomodulator pharmaceuticals. This condition is likely to be Permanent. I consider that a hypothetical person with this disease or condition, at the same severity as the applicant, would be likely to require health care or community services during the period specified above.
These services would be likely to include: Pharmaceuticals
Provision of these health care and/or community services would be likely to result in a significant cost to the Australian community in the areas of health care and/or community services. In preparing this opinion, I have had regard to the information available to date concerning the applicant, including, but not limited to the immigration medical examination and a report from Haematologist <our doctor back home>

-- Letter 3: Extract from migration regulations 1994 --
Unable to post a link, first URL when you google 'Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4005'
2. No harm in trying

3. Maybe just maybe ..can you get a travel policy issued by a Australian based Insurance company ?
Just thinking loud but worth exploring although the chances of getting issued are very low and even if issued, may ask for astronomical premium

Cheers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
Checking your feedback

Thanks a lot for your reply, newbienz. I will try checking with an insurance company.
Hi sunrise406,

Sorry to hear about this.

Since, my father's tourist visa subclass 600 is requested exactly same information (he has a stomach cancer), I am really interested to ask you How did you go about your father's case ? What did you responded ? What letters/documents you provided ? and What was the outcome ?

Are you able to help advise me here ?

Thanks,
hopepositi
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,145 Posts
Hi sunrise406,

Sorry to hear about this.

Since, my father's tourist visa subclass 600 is requested exactly same information (he has a stomach cancer), I am really interested to ask you How did you go about your father's case ? What did you responded ? What letters/documents you provided ? and What was the outcome ?

Are you able to help advise me here ?

Thanks,
hopepositi
Don’t have high hopes of him replying
He has not logged into the forum since March last year

Consult a medical case specialist Mara agent

Cheers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
Don’t have high hopes of him replying
He has not logged into the forum since March last year

Consult a medical case specialist Mara agent

Cheers


Noted, mate. Is there a way to contact him directly somehow ?

Or any other possible option you can suggest to seek inputs on my query from the experts here ?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,145 Posts
Noted, mate. Is there a way to contact him directly somehow ?

Or any other possible option you can suggest to seek inputs on my query from the experts here ?
I don’t think you can contact any member directly
Moreover Medical cases are unique and generally experiences can’t be juxtaposed
If you are serious, you should consult a Mara agent

It may be worth consulting with MARA agents with a reputation for helping clients navigate the health requirement - just sharing their names, I haven't had anything to do with them:

George Lombard

Peter Bollard

Cheers
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top