Expat Forum For People Moving Overseas And Living Abroad banner

ICT Security Specliast 262112

5K views 23 replies 12 participants last post by  punprash 
#1 ·
ANZSCO Code: 262112 ICT security specialists

Hi,

How can I check points needed for 189 visa for ICT security specialists code? And also the waiting time for this code in 189 visa?

Thank you

Neha
 
#2 ·
Hi,

How can I check points needed for 189 visa for ICT security specialists code? And also the waiting time for this code in 189 visa?

Thank you

Neha
Try back next week when 12 July results are published.
 
#4 ·
Let the points and cutoff dates be released mid next week

Cheers
 
#8 ·
Now that Security Specialist 262112 is under 189, I plan to submit my ACS assessement. Is there anyone with a recent positive assessment? Can you please help me with your roles and responsibilities?
 
#9 ·
The ideal roles for 262112 are given in the Anzsco website

Check how many of those roles actually match your roles and if you qualify for a positive assessment under the code

Your assessment has to be based on your actual roles in the company and not somebody else's

Cheers
 
#15 ·
If education is identifed as ICT major, minimum of 2 years deduction is happening and in case of ICT minor, 4 years are being deducted for positive assessment. Designation doesnt matter in my opinion, all that matters is the RnR letter from the organization.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandy2137
#22 ·
I am DBA but my designation on offer letter is Associate consultant Oracle.

Can I reevaluate by degrees as ICT security specialist as 80% of roles and responsibilities are matching with my current roles and responsibilities?

ICT security specialist is in SOL list so I can apply under visa 189 but 262111 is in CSOL so only option available is 190 visa.

Please reply.
 
#23 ·
You can get it reevaluated but it's ACS who needs to agree that you qualify for that skill. Else you may end up ACS recommending with same DBA skill.

Sent from my Redmi 4 using Tapatalk
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top