No, you implied that Gorsuch was unopposed. He wasn'tNow I'm really confused. All those citations just posted about Gorsuch refer to political opposition on ideaological grounds. So we are now to equate political opposition with "character assassination"? With accusations of sexual assault? This disingenuous reliance on false equivalencies has become the go-to argument whenever facts are in short supply.
But in any case, I intended the post about Gorsuch not to relitigate his confirmation, but solely to point out that Sean Hannity has a better command of bluster than of fact. And thus is not a credible source.
Edited to add: But I'm afraid this is really an absurdly minor point, given the credibility of so many other cited sources!