Expat Forum For People Moving Overseas And Living Abroad banner

1 - 20 of 141 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,411 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
The approval of Kavanaugh is stalled as Democrats want more of his documents released. Of course it's fine if Hillary deleted 30,000 emails, that is allowed. The hypocrisy of this is enormous, you can't make this stuff up.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,411 Posts
Discussion Starter #2
63 disruptions, 1 hour 15 minute delay and 70 arrested on day one of the Kavanaugh confirmation hearing, meet the new Democratic party
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
670 Posts
The approval of Kavanaugh is stalled as Democrats want more of his documents released. Of course it's fine if Hillary deleted 30,000 emails, that is allowed. The hypocrisy of this is enormous, you can't make this stuff up.
You do realize that Hillary's e-mails were investigated for over 15 months. How long has Kavanagh's nomination been "stalled". Let us know if it's still grinding on if we turn the calendar to 2020. Obama's SC nomination of Garland was held up for 10 months, essentially stolen and gifted to Trump. Hypocrisy indeed. It's being a cry-bully, and Trumpistas are already whining about two days.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,417 Posts
The approval of Kavanaugh is stalled as Democrats want more of his documents released. Of course it's fine if Hillary deleted 30,000 emails, that is allowed. The hypocrisy of this is enormous, you can't make this stuff up.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-cries-people-making-120948248.html

" Donald Trump Cries About People Making Up Stories, Gets Brutally Taken To Task

President Donald Trump used Twitter to complain about people making up stories on Wednesday, and other social media users could almost taste the irony.

Trump said it was “a shame that someone can write an article or book, totally make up stories and form a picture of a person that is literally the exact opposite of the fact, and get away with it without retribution or cost.”

Your definition of a hypocrite needs clarification - a perfect example in the link above.

Your example and complaint is not hypocritical but comparing A to B which doesn't work with educated people. Probably just another Fox News dumbed down tactic for their dumbed down base.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,411 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
You do realize that Hillary's e-mails were investigated for over 15 months..
How do you investigate deleted emails, crushed blackberries and wiped, destroyed computers? What was investigated? She destroyed subpoenaed evidence which is a crime and still no charges. News now is that China hacked her email in real time resuting in the death of 18 - 20 CIA agents.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,081 Posts
If there ever was a distraction, it's this post election focus on the candidate who lost. If Hillary Clinton were jailed tomorrow, would it make you feel better about the way the U.S. is being led by a man who obviously has only the interests of the very rich and his own stardom at heart?

How about focusing on the present, where documents are presently being withheld lest any suspicions be cast on the SCOTUS candidate? If there's nothing in them to show the candidate may not be telling the whole truth about his positions, then why aren't these documents being released?
This raises a host of suspicions in my mind, since this appointment is going to affect the Supreme Court decisions for many years to come and is far more important than old issues at present.

My own speculation is that what he's saying to the committee has nothing to do with how he will vote when he gets the job.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,411 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
Your example and complaint is not hypocritical but comparing A to B which doesn't work with educated people. Probably just another Fox News dumbed down tactic for their dumbed down base.
For all of that education that you keep touting you sure have trouble following the simple subject which is the massive hypocrisy of democrats wanting more documents when they turn a blind eye to Hillary's massive cover up by destroying 30,000 emails.

Your entire response, as usual was a diversion from the simple subject because you have no "educated"reply.

di·ver·sion
dəˈvərZHən,dīˈvərZHən/Submit
noun
1.
an instance of turning something aside from its course.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,081 Posts
I find it hard to believe that any intelligent person thinks that equating Hillary's emails has anything to do with today's hearings. These are separate issues to anyone not drinking Koolaid sourced news, exclusively. Of course, the Democrats want the documents since their attempt to derail this SCOTUS appointment is headed for failure without the necessary votes from at least a few GOP senators.

Remember how the GOP refused to even honor the choice of Obama re Garland with a hearing, or didn't that even tickle your radar? That was the ultimate insult to a sitting POTUS. They did it only because they COULD. Now the DEMS are doing what they CAN as payback. Duh.

Newsflash: Hillary Clinton did not win the election and any misdeeds of hers are irrelevant at this point, but they seem to be all you have in your ammunition store. And, at this point, it looks like a number of people should be "locked up". Dont'cha just love how Trump defends the criminals who have been convicted in a court of law of tax cheating and fraud? Tells me a lot about his REAL attitude towards white collar crime. It's okay, just in case he did it, too.

And another thing: You think Trump will EVER release his tax returns?

And just in from today's hearings re what's going to happen if the SCOTUS candidate actually gets the job and WHY the information has been withheld:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kavanaug...t-testimony-abortion-precedent-155719304.html

I rest my case: he's a liar!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,417 Posts
For all of that education that you keep touting you sure have trouble following the simple subject which is the massive hypocrisy of democrats wanting more documents when they turn a blind eye to Hillary's massive cover up by destroying 30,000 emails.

Your entire response, as usual was a diversion from the simple subject because you have no "educated"reply.

di·ver·sion
dəˈvərZHən,dīˈvərZHən/Submit
noun
1.
an instance of turning something aside from its course.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy

" After allegations were raised that some of the emails in question contained classified information, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) initiated an investigation regarding the origin and handling of classified emails on Clinton's server. FBI Director James Comey identified 110 emails as containing information that was classified at the time it was sent, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" and 22 deemed "Top Secret". None of these had classification markings. However, as noted in Clinton's non-disclosure agreement, unmarked classified information should be treated the same as marked classified information. An additional three email chains contained "portion markings", simply a "(C)" indicating "Confidential" in front of one or more paragraphs. These were not included in Comey's list of 110 because the State Department failed to confirm they were classified at the time they were sent. Clinton told the FBI she did not know the meaning of "(C)". Nearly 2,100 emails on the server were retroactively marked as classified by the State Department.

News reports indicated that while some of the emails contained information that the government considered classified to the highest levels, the information was "innocuous" and not "particularly sensitive" because the emails discussed matters that were simultaneously available in the public domain—such as in newspapers—but the government "owning agency" that acquired that same information by secret means maintains and enforces the classification status nevertheless.[4][5][6] The Los Angeles Times reported in October 2015, "Critics, including many current and former officials, have argued for years that the government classifies too much information, often for reasons that have little to do with actual security threats."

In May 2016, the State Department's Office of the Inspector General released an 83-page report about the State Department's email practices, including Clinton's. In July 2016, Comey announced that the FBI's investigation had concluded that Clinton was "extremely careless" in handling her email system but recommended that no charges be filed against her. On July 6, 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced that no charges would be filed. US presidential candidate Donald Trump used the nickname Crooked Hillary to criticize Clinton primarily in relation to the email controversy.[7]

On October 28, 2016, just days before 2016 election day, Comey notified Congress that the FBI had started looking into newly discovered emails that may be pertinent to the case. On November 6, Comey notified Congress that the FBI had not changed its conclusion, reached in July, regarding Clinton's emails"

Read the truth and educate yourself instead of relying on right wing disinformation media. Do yourself a favor. Comey actually helped Republicans by re-opening the closed case and what does Trump do to thank him - fire him, ruin his reputation and career. One of many high level federal government officials Trump has destroyed. Lately on his list is Sessions, Mueller etc.. Do you think anyone in office or the public wants more of this type of inappropiate behaviour to continue? Honestly!
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,411 Posts
Discussion Starter #11
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy

" After allegations were raised that some of the emails in question contained classified information, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) initiated an investigation regarding the origin and handling of classified emails on Clinton's server. FBI Director James Comey identified 110 emails as containing information that was classified at the time it was sent, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" and 22 deemed "Top Secret". None of these had classification markings. However, as noted in Clinton's non-disclosure agreement, unmarked classified information should be treated the same as marked classified information. An additional three email chains contained "portion markings", simply a "(C)" indicating "Confidential" in front of one or more paragraphs. These were not included in Comey's list of 110 because the State Department failed to confirm they were classified at the time they were sent. Clinton told the FBI she did not know the meaning of "(C)". Nearly 2,100 emails on the server were retroactively marked as classified by the State Department.

News reports indicated that while some of the emails contained information that the government considered classified to the highest levels, the information was "innocuous" and not "particularly sensitive" because the emails discussed matters that were simultaneously available in the public domain—such as in newspapers—but the government "owning agency" that acquired that same information by secret means maintains and enforces the classification status nevertheless.[4][5][6] The Los Angeles Times reported in October 2015, "Critics, including many current and former officials, have argued for years that the government classifies too much information, often for reasons that have little to do with actual security threats."

In May 2016, the State Department's Office of the Inspector General released an 83-page report about the State Department's email practices, including Clinton's. In July 2016, Comey announced that the FBI's investigation had concluded that Clinton was "extremely careless" in handling her email system but recommended that no charges be filed against her. On July 6, 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced that no charges would be filed. US presidential candidate Donald Trump used the nickname Crooked Hillary to criticize Clinton primarily in relation to the email controversy.[7]

On October 28, 2016, just days before 2016 election day, Comey notified Congress that the FBI had started looking into newly discovered emails that may be pertinent to the case. On November 6, Comey notified Congress that the FBI had not changed its conclusion, reached in July, regarding Clinton's emails"

Read the truth and educate yourself instead of relying on right wing disinformation media. Do yourself a favor. Comey actually helped Republicans by re-opening the closed case and what does Trump do to thank him - fire him, ruin his reputation and career. One of many high level federal government officials Trump has destroyed. Lately on his list is Sessions, Mueller etc.. Do you think anyone in office or the public wants more of this type of inappropiate behaviour to continue? Honestly!
Really? Wikipedia again? Who can edit Wikipedia? Anyone. Who can add to Wikipedia? Anyone. That is why it's not allowed as a reference in most colleges from "educated" people.

You tell me to "educate myself instead of relying on right wing disinformation" while you blindly believe the pablum being being spoon fed by the left. Does is not seem just a little strange that only one station reports other facts which the mainstream media ignores, twists or just lies about?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,081 Posts
Are you saying that what AlanMexicali quoted (the substance of which can be found from MANY other sources than Wikipedia) is incorrect? That is the point, isn't it: getting the facts? If you have actual evidence to contradict it, let's see it.

Bias is inevitable with news sources, and can be exercised by leaving items out as well as by reporting all the matters that reinforce a point of view.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
670 Posts
Really? Wikipedia again? Who can edit Wikipedia? Anyone. Who can add to Wikipedia? Anyone. That is why it's not allowed as a reference in most colleges from "educated" people.

You tell me to "educate myself instead of relying on right wing disinformation" while you blindly believe the pablum being being spoon fed by the left. Does is not seem just a little strange that only one station reports other facts which the mainstream media ignores, twists or just lies about?
Your disgust at Wikipedia seems to be that anyone can contribute anything which is why it's not a good reference to put in an academic paper. Wiki is a good place to start research but a very poor place to end it. Right-wing nutblogs OTOH don't let anyone contribute unless they hold a certain, narrow viewpoint, the encourage followers to do not find other sources, unless they say the same thing. Always check through references and "facts" in sources, and don't be a tool. You've come up wanting in that task and I've called you out before for not simply neglecting to drill down through the sources of an article you cited, but not even fully reading the article itself, rather just finding a headline, skimming tidbits that support your POV and tossing the rest. That's how crazy conspiracy ideas grow legs and start running unimpeded, and that's dangerous to democracy.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,417 Posts
278.^ Jump up to: a b Brennan, Margaret & Paula Reid, State Dept. to comply with court order on Hillary Clinton's emails, CBS News, May 19, 2015.
279.^ Jump up to: a b Gerstein, Josh. Feds fight Hillary Clinton-focused email lawsuit, Politico.com, March 28, 2015.
280.Jump up ^ Joint Status Report Regarding Schedule (filed March 27, 2015) ("Plaintiff Jason Leopold initiated this Freedom of Information Act ('FOIA') lawsuit against Defendant U.S. Department of State on January 25, 2015. (ECF No. 1). The Department of State answered the complaint on March 2, 2015 (ECF No. 7)").
281.Jump up ^ Margaret Brennan & Paula Reid, "State Dept. to comply with court order on Hillary Clinton's emails", CBS News, May 19, 2015.
282.Jump up ^ Andrew Zajac & Billy House, Judge orders rolling release of Clinton's State Department e-mail, Bloomberg News, May 20, 2015.
283.Jump up ^ Jason Leopold, "Judge Orders State Department to Release Clinton Emails on Rolling Basis", Vice News, May 19, 2015.
284.Jump up ^ Myers, Steven Lee & Julie Hirschfeld Davis. Last Batch of Hillary Clinton’s Emails Is Released, The New York Times, February 29, 2016.
285.Jump up ^ "Search Hillary Clinton’s Emails", The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved April 17, 2016.
286.Jump up ^ "WikiLeaks publishes searchable archive of Clinton emails", Washington Examiner. Retrieved May 9, 2016.
287.Jump up ^ Dana Bash and Marshall Cohen. "GOP megadonor requested Trump's data firm organize hacked Clinton emails". CNN. Retrieved April 21, 2018.
288.Jump up ^ Confessore, Nicholas (October 25, 2017). "Assange Says WikiLeaks Rejected Request by Data Firm Tied to Trump". New York Times. Retrieved April 21, 2018.
289.Jump up ^ Baker, Peter & Steve Ederjune, New Trove of Hillary Clinton's Emails Highlights Workaday Tasks at the State Department, The New York Times, June 30, 2015.
290.Jump up ^ Schultheis, Emily & Lauren Fox, State Department Releases More Hillary Clinton Emails Archived August 21, 2015, at the Wayback Machine., National Journal, July 31, 2015.
291.Jump up ^ Kumar, Anita & Greg Gordon & Marisa Taylor, Investigators now examining 305 Clinton emails for classified information, McClatchy Washington Bureau (August 17, 2015).
292.^ Jump up to: a b Associated Press, Associated Press sues State Department for Hillary Clinton emails, CBS News, March 11, 2015.
293.Jump up ^ Complaint, Associated Press v. U.S. Department of State (filed March 11, 2015).
294.^ Jump up to: a b c Eric Tucker, Clinton records: Judge sets schedule for release to AP Archived August 11, 2015, at the Wayback Machine., Associated Press, August 7, 2015.
295.^ Jump up to: a b Josh Gerstein, Judge slams State Department over Hillary Clinton-related records, Politico.com, July 20, 2015.
296.Jump up ^ David Francis, "Judge: The 'Least Ambitious' Bureaucrat Could Process Clinton's Personal Emails Faster", Foreign Policy, July 30, 2015.
297.Jump up ^ Josh Gerstein, Feds move to consolidate lawsuits over Hillary Clinton emails, Politico, September 1, 2015.
298.^ Jump up to: a b Tau, Byron, Court Declines to Consolidate Clinton Emails Lawsuits, The Wall Street Journal, October 8, 2015.
299.Jump up ^ Judge dismisses pair of lawsuits arising from Clinton emails Archived April 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine., Associated Press, January 11, 2016.
300.Jump up ^ Biesecker, Michael (March 15, 2016). "GOP files a flurry of new lawsuits seeking reams of government documents related to Clinton's tenure as secretary of state". U.S. News and World Report. Associated Press. Retrieved September 16, 2016.
301.Jump up ^ Tau, Byron. "Estimate of 75 Years to Release Clinton Aides' Email 'Not an Outlandish Estimation'". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved July 5, 2016. "
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,417 Posts
245.^ Jump up to: a b Bradley Klapper & Matthew Lee, State Dept.: 15 emails missing from Clinton cache, Associated Press (June 25, 2015).
246.^ Jump up to: a b Ben German (June 28, 2015). "GOP's Benghazi Probe Ups Pressure on John Kerry as Team Clinton Returns Fire: Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy said he may call the secretary of State to testify about a lack of document production". National Journal. Archived from the original on June 29, 2015.
247.Jump up ^ Dionne, E.J. (September 30, 2015). "Kevin McCarthy's truthful gaffe on Benghazi". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 7, 2015.
248.Jump up ^ Lillis, Mike (October 1, 2015). "Pelosi threatens to end Dem participation in Benghazi probe". The Hill. Retrieved October 7, 2015.
249.Jump up ^ Byron Tau. "House Democrats to Release Benghazi Interview Transcript". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved October 7, 2015.
250.Jump up ^ Elise Viebeck (October 6, 2015). "Democrats work to keep heat on Gowdy, McCarthy ahead of Clinton Benghazi hearing". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 7, 2015.
251.Jump up ^ Kopan, Tal; Deirdre Walsh (October 7, 2015). "Democrats go on offense after McCarthy's Benghazi gaffe". CNN. Retrieved October 7, 2015.
252.Jump up ^ "Shut Down the Benghazi Committee". The New York Times. October 7, 2015. Retrieved October 7, 2015.
253.Jump up ^ "Grayson to File Benghazi Ethics Complaint Over Benghazi". Roll Call. Retrieved October 7, 2015.
254.Jump up ^ "GOP Rep. Richard Hanna suggests Benghazi probe targeted Hillary Clinton". syracuse.com. Retrieved October 16, 2015.
255.Jump up ^ "Bill O'Reilly on Benghazi probe: 'Of course it's political'". Politico. Retrieved October 16, 2015.
256.^ Jump up to: a b c d Michael D. Shear & Michael S. Schmidt, Benghazi Panel Engages Clinton in Tense Session, The New York Times, October 22, 2015.
257.Jump up ^ Fahrenthold, David A.; Viebeck, Elise (October 22, 2015). "GOP lands no solid punches while sparring with Clinton over Benghazi". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 23, 2015.
258.Jump up ^ "Full Text of Hearing: "Clinton testifies before House committee on Benghazi"". The Washington Post. October 22, 2015. Retrieved October 23, 2015.
259.^ Jump up to: a b c Judicial Watch, Citing Misconduct and Misrepresentation by Hillary Clinton and State Department, Judicial Watch Asks Federal Court to Reopen Lawsuit Seeking Information on Top Clinton Aide Huma Abedin (March 12, 2015).
260.Jump up ^ Judicial Watch, Huma Outside Employment Complaint (September 10, 2013)
261.Jump up ^ Court order reopening case (June 19, 2015).
262.Jump up ^ Judicial Watch Statement in Response to Federal Court Reopening Lawsuit Seeking Information on Top Clinton Aide Huma Abedin Archived September 24, 2015, at the Wayback Machine., Judicial Watch (June 19, 2015).
263.Jump up ^ Gerstein, Josh (August 1, 2015). "Judge wants Clinton certification on emails". Politico. Retrieved August 5, 2015.
264.Jump up ^ Flores, Reena (August 1, 2015). "Judge wants Clinton confirmation on State Department emails". CBS News. Retrieved August 5, 2015.
265.^ Jump up to: a b Clinton Declaration (filed August 10, 2015).
266.^ Jump up to: a b c Michael S. Schmidt (August 10, 2015). "All Emails Were Provided, Hillary Clinton Says in Statement". The New York Times. Retrieved August 11, 2015. "I have directed that all my emails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or potentially were federal records be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done"
267.^ Jump up to: a b Rosalind S. Helderman, Hillary Clinton swears: I turned over all my required e-mails, The Washington Post, August 10, 2015.
268.^ Jump up to: a b c d Labott, Elise; Levitt, Ross (September 25, 2015). "New Hillary Clinton email chain discovered". CNN. Retrieved September 28, 2015.
269.^ Jump up to: a b c Klapper, Bradley (September 25, 2015). "Officials: More work emails from Clinton's private account". Associated Press. Retrieved September 28, 2015.
270.^ Jump up to: a b c Woolf, Nicky (September 25, 2015). "Officials uncover two chains of emails Hillary Clinton didn't turn over". The Guardian. Retrieved September 28, 2015.
271.Jump up ^ Schmidt, Michael (September 25, 2015). "String of Emails Raises Questions About When Hillary Clinton Began Using Personal Account". The New York Times. Retrieved September 28, 2015.
272.Jump up ^ Hsu, Spenser S. U.S. judge orders discovery to go forward over Clinton’s private email system, The Washington Post, February 23, 2016.
273.Jump up ^ JW v. State Lukens Testimony 01363 (May 26, 2016).
274.Jump up ^ JW v State Mills deposition 01363.
275.Jump up ^ "Clinton Email Update: Judicial Watch Releases Clinton Email Deposition Testimony of Amb. Stephen Mull, Former Executive Secretary for State Department – Judicial Watch". Retrieved July 6, 2016.
276.Jump up ^ "Clinton Email Update: Judicial Watch Releases Clinton Email Deposition Testimony of Karin Lang, Director, Executive Secretariat Staff – Judicial Watch". judicialwatch.org. Retrieved July 6, 2016.
277.Jump up ^ Gerstein, Josh (June 9, 2016). "Clinton BlackBerry photo led to State official's query about email account". Politico. Retrieved June 11, 2016.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,417 Posts
202.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton had right to delete personal emails, says US justice department". The Guardian. Associated Press. September 11, 2015. Retrieved November 4, 2016.
203.Jump up ^ O'Harrow, Robert. "How Clinton's email scandal took root", The Washington Post, March 27, 2016.
204.Jump up ^ Vorhees, Josh. A Crystal-Clear Explanation of Hillary's Confusing Email Scandal, Slate, August 20, 2015.
205.Jump up ^ Struyk, Ryan & Liz Kreutz, Hillary Clinton Jokes About Wiping Email Server 'With A Cloth Or Something', ABC News, August 18, 2015.
206.Jump up ^ Wilstein, Matt. "Jimmy Fallon Gives Hillary a Pass on 'Boring' Emails". Mediaite. Retrieved April 16, 2016.
207.Jump up ^ Leonnig, Carol D., Karen Tumulty & Rosalind S. Helderman (August 14, 2015). "Clinton's team went from nonchalant to nervous over e-mail controversy". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 18, 2015. "... it has become clear that a number of her statements defending her actions now appear to be false."
208.^ Jump up to: a b Tau, Byron & Robert McMillan. Hillary Clinton Campaign Says Classified Emails Were on Server, The Wall Street Journal, August 19, 2015.
209.Jump up ^ Kessler, Glenn, "Hillary Clinton's claim that everything I did on e-mails was permitted", The Washington Post, July 9, 2015.
210.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton's first national interview of 2016 Race", CNN, July 7, 2015.
211.Jump up ^ Kreutz, Liz (September 8, 2015). "Hillary Clinton on Private Email: 'That Was a Mistake. I'm Sorry'". ABC News.
212.Jump up ^ Lisa Lerer, Clinton Compares email Attacks to White House Controversies, Associated Press, September 27, 2015.
213.Jump up ^ Douglas Cox (July 27, 2015). "Hillary Clinton email controversy: How serious is it?". CNN.
214.Jump up ^ Glenn Kessler (February 4, 2016). "How did 'top secret' emails end up on Hillary Clinton's server?". The Washington Post.
215.Jump up ^ Ken Dilanian. "Clinton Emails Held Indirect References to Undercover CIA Officers". NBC News.
216.Jump up ^ Gearan, Anne. "Big batch of Clinton e-mails released; some have redactions", The Washington Post, August 31, 2015: "Under the law, it is the responsibility of the author of e-mails to properly mark them as classified and to make sure they avoid discussing classified material over a nongovernment or personal device. Because the State Department deals in so many sensitive secrets, many employees use two computer networks for their daily communications: a non-classified system called the "low side" and a more secure classified system called the "high side." But Clinton had no official State Department e-mail address and exclusively used a personal domain and personal server set up in her home for electronic correspondence."
217.Jump up ^ "Clinton’s claim that the FBI director at the time, James Comey, said that Clinton's email answers were truthful", The Washington Post, July 31, 2016.
218.Jump up ^ [2]Washington Post hits Clinton with four 'Pinnochios' on emails, CNN (August 1, 2016).
219.Jump up ^ "WaPo Gives Hillary Four Pinocchios For Claiming Comey Called Her Truthful About Her Emails", Fox News Channel, August 1, 2016.
220.^ Jump up to: a b c d Patrick Healy, Jonathan Martin & Maggie Haberman, Hillary Clinton’s Handling of Email Issue Frustrates Democratic Leaders, The New York Times, August 27, 2015.
221.Jump up ^ Roy, Jessica. "Watch Bernie Sanders slay the room with 'damn emails' line", Los Angeles Times, October 13, 2015.
222.^ Jump up to: a b Terkel, Amanda. "Bernie Sanders: No Regrets Defending Hillary Clinton on Emails", HuffPost, October 19, 2015.
223.Jump up ^ Foley, Elise. Bernie Sanders Calls Hillary Clinton’s Emails ‘A Very Serious Issue’, Huffington Post (January 31, 2016).
224.Jump up ^ Joyce, Gemma (October 12, 2017). ""But Her Emails!" Unpicking the Social Media Phenomenon That Is Hillary Clinton's Emails". Brandwatch. Retrieved 3 August 2018.
225.Jump up ^ "but her emails". Urban Dictionary. Retrieved 3 August 2018.
226.Jump up ^ Cummings, William (June 14, 2018). "'But my emails': Hillary Clinton claps back after report reveals Comey used Gmail". USA Today. Retrieved 3 August 2018.
227.^ Jump up to: a b Halper, Evan and Michael A. Memoli, "More of Hillary Clinton's emails say little about State Department tenure", Los Angeles Times, June 30, 2015.
228.Jump up ^ Memoli, Michael A. Next batch of Hillary Clinton's emails will be released, Los Angeles Times, June 30, 2015.
229.Jump up ^ Gerth, Jeff (March 16, 2015). "Hillary Clinton's Email Scandal Looks a Lot Like the Whitewater Investigation of 20 Years Ago". Pacific Standard. Retrieved October 13, 2015.
230.Jump up ^ Security questions linger in Clinton emails, Morning Joe, August 19, 2015.
231.Jump up ^ Milbank, Dana (March 9, 2015). "Hillary Clinton, too cautious for her own good". The Washington Post.
232.Jump up ^ Boehlert, Eric (March 12, 2015). "The George W. Bush email scandal the media has conveniently forgotten". Salon. Retrieved July 5, 2016.
233.^ Jump up to: a b Carroll, Lauren (March 15, 2015). "The media reaction to George W. Bush's email controversy". PolitiFact. Retrieved October 13, 2015.
234.Jump up ^ "Clinton's abysmal record on open government". jsonline.com. Retrieved November 14, 2016.
235.Jump up ^ "Wisconsin's largest paper blasts Clinton on transparency". POLITICO.
236.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton's litany of scandal". The Week. Retrieved March 31, 2016.
237.^ Jump up to: a b c Cummings, William (November 4, 2016). "Fox News anchor apologizes for false report of 'likely' Clinton indictment". USA Today. Retrieved November 7, 2016.
238.^ Jump up to: a b c Farhi, Paul (November 4, 2016). "Fox News apologizes for falsely reporting that Clinton faces indictment". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 7, 2016.
239.Jump up ^ David Graham (Nov 4, 2016), "The Anatomy of a Leak: How Did a Mistaken Clinton Story Happen?", The Atlantic
240.Jump up ^ Emery, David (November 4, 2016). "Premature Litigation". Snopes.com. Retrieved November 7, 2016.
241.Jump up ^ "Statement Regarding Subpoena Compliance and Server Determination by Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton | Select Committee on Benghazi". Benghazi.house.gov. October 28, 2014. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
242.Jump up ^ Perry, Mark. "Trey Gowdy: Hillary Clinton wiped email server clean". Politico.com. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
243.Jump up ^ "No Copies of Hillary Clinton Emails on Server Lawyer Says". The New York Times. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
244.Jump up ^ "Select Committee Adds to Secretary Clinton's Public Email Record". Select Committee on Benghazi. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,417 Posts
142.^ Jump up to: a b c Helderman, Rosalind S.; Hamburger, Tom; Leonnig, Carol D. (September 12, 2015). "Tech company: No indication that Clinton's e-mail server was 'wiped'". Washington Post. Retrieved September 13, 2015.
143.Jump up ^ Del Quentin Wilber (September 22, 2015). "FBI Said to Recover Personal E-Mails From Hillary Clinton Server". Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved September 23, 2015.
144.Jump up ^ Rachael Bade, "FBI steps up interviews in Clinton email probe; Questions focus on whether State officials improperly sent classified material", Politico.com, November 10, 2015. Retrieved November 14, 2016.
145.Jump up ^ Taylor Tyler, "Clinton Emails: FBI Expands Investigation Into Clinton Email Setup", Headlines & Global News, November 10, 2015. Retrieved November 14, 2016.
146.Jump up ^ Melber, Ari (March 30, 2016). "Fed Source: About 12 FBI Agents Working on Clinton Email Inquiry". MSNBC. Retrieved April 29, 2016.
147.Jump up ^ Calabresi, Massimo (March 31, 2016). "Inside the FBI Investigation of Hillary Clinton's E-Mail". Time. Retrieved April 29, 2016.
148.Jump up ^ "FBI's James Comey: I feel 'pressure' to quickly finish Clinton email probe". politico.com. May 11, 2016.
149.^ Jump up to: a b "Lynch to Accept F.B.I. Recommendations in Clinton Email Inquiry, Official Says". NYT. July 1, 2016.
150.Jump up ^ "Attorney General Loretta Lynch Calls It 'Perfectly Reasonable' to Question Bill Clinton Meeting". ABC News. July 1, 2016.
151.Jump up ^ "Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton meeting raises eyebrows". USA Today. June 30, 2016.
152.^ Jump up to: a b "FBI Contradicts Clinton's Email Claims on Classified Info". ABC News. July 5, 2016.
153.^ Jump up to: a b "FBI tears holes in Hillary Clinton's email defense". politifact.com.
154.^ Jump up to: a b "Clinton's claims about receiving or sending 'classified material' on her private e-mail system". The Washington Post. August 27, 2015.
155.^ Jump up to: a b c "Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton's Use of a Personal E-Mail System". Federal Bureau of Investigation. July 5, 2016. Retrieved July 13, 2016.
156.^ Jump up to: a b News, A.B.C. (July 6, 2016). "FBI Recommends No Charges Over Clinton Email Use". ABC News.
157.^ Jump up to: a b Zapotosky, Matt; Helderman, Rosalind S. (July 5, 2016). "FBI recommends no criminal charges in Clinton email probe". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 5, 2016.
158.Jump up ^ Epatko, Larisa (July 5, 2016). "FBI director recommends 'no charges' over Clinton's emails". PBS. Retrieved November 4, 2016.
159.Jump up ^ "Clinton e-mail Investigation". Federal Bureau of Investigation. July 2016. Retrieved October 28, 2016.
160.Jump up ^ CNN, Collinson, Stephen & Tal Kopan. "FBI: Clinton 'extremely careless' but no charges recommended".
161.Jump up ^ Graff, Garrett M. (September 30, 2016). "What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton's Email Server". Politico. Retrieved November 4, 2016.
162.Jump up ^ Zapotosky, Matt (July 6, 2016). "Justice Department closes Clinton email probe without charges". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 6, 2016.
163.^ Jump up to: a b Perez, Evan (October 30, 2016). "FBI discovered Clinton-related emails weeks ago". CNN. Retrieved November 14, 2016.
164.Jump up ^ Perez, Evan; Brown, Pamela (October 29, 2016). "Comey notified Congress of email probe despite DOJ concerns". CNN. Retrieved October 29, 2016.
165.^ Jump up to: a b c "Comey notified Congress of email probe despite DOJ concerns". CNN. October 30, 2016. Retrieved November 5, 2016.
166.Jump up ^ Bowman, Michael. "Officials: FBI Knew About Possible New Clinton Emails Weeks Before Friday Announcement". VOA. Retrieved 2016-10-31.
167.Jump up ^ "Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton Email Scandal 'Worse Than Watergate'". Time. October 17, 2016.
168.Jump up ^ Schreckinger, Ben (October 28, 2016). "Trump hails new Clinton FBI review as 'bigger than Watergate'". Politico. Retrieved October 31, 2016.
169.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton demands answers and Democrats call foul as FBI reopens investigation over files found on sexting congressman's computer". The Telegraph. October 30, 2016. Retrieved November 14, 2016.
170.Jump up ^ "FBI finds no criminality in review of newly discovered Clinton emails". Retrieved November 14, 2016.
171.Jump up ^ "Emails Warrant No New Action Against Hillary Clinton, F.B.I. Director Says". The New York Times. November 6, 2016. Retrieved November 6, 2016.
172.Jump up ^ "No criminality in Clinton emails – FBI". BBC. November 6, 2016. Retrieved November 14, 2016.
173.Jump up ^ "FBI director says agency once again won't recommend charges over Clinton email". The Washington Post. November 6, 2016. Retrieved November 14, 2016.
174.Jump up ^ Shell, Adam; Jane Onyanga-Omara (November 7, 2016). "Dow surges 300 points as FBI clears Clinton on eve of election". USA Today. Retrieved November 7, 2016.
175.Jump up ^ Imbert, Fred (November 7, 2016). "Dow soars 350 points higher on eve of US election; financials, health care lead". CNBC. Retrieved November 14, 2016.
176.Jump up ^ Mikolajczak, Chuck (November 7, 2016). "Stocks, dollar jump as FBI clears Clinton in email probe". Reuters. Retrieved November 16, 2016.
177.Jump up ^ Lawler, David (November 13, 2016). "US election: Hillary Clinton blames loss on FBI's James Comey in call with top donors". The Telegraph. Retrieved January 13, 2017.
178.Jump up ^ Ainsley, Julia Edwards; Harte, Julia (January 13, 2017). "FBI investigated over pre-election decisions on Clinton email". Reuters. Retrieved January 13, 2017.
179.Jump up ^ Cohen, Kelly. "James Comey: Loretta Lynch told me not to call Clinton email probe an 'investigation'". Washington Examiner. Retrieved 2017-07-05.
180.Jump up ^ News, A. B. C. (2017-06-23). "Senate probes Loretta Lynch's alleged interference in Clinton investigation". ABC News. Retrieved 2017-07-07.
181.Jump up ^ "Senate Investigating Loretta Lynch's Alleged Interference in Hillary Clinton Email Probe". Retrieved 2017-07-07.
182.Jump up ^ "The Senate is investigating whether former Attorney General Loretta Lynch interfered in the Clinton email investigation". Business Insider. Retrieved 2017-07-05.
183.Jump up ^ Parkinson, John (2017-06-23). "Senate probes Loretta Lynch's alleged interference in Clinton investigation". ABC News. Retrieved 2017-07-05.
184.Jump up ^ Labott, Elise; Lee, MJ (July 9, 2016). "Clinton reiterates email use was a 'mistake' as State Dept. reopens probe". Salon. Retrieved November 5, 2016.
185.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton emails: US State Department restarts probe". BBC.
186.^ Jump up to: a b Reilly, Ryan J. (June 14, 2018). "DOJ Watchdog Slams 'Insubordinate' James Comey Over Clinton Email News Conference". Huffington Post. Retrieved 16 June 2018.
187.Jump up ^ "Comey's actions 'extraordinary and insubordinate,' report says". CNN. June 14, 2018. Retrieved 16 June 2018.
188.^ Jump up to: a b c d e Jeffrey Toobin, Hillary's Problem: The Government Classifies Everything, The New Yorker, August 18, 2015.
189.^ Jump up to: a b c German, Ben. The Other 'Top Secret' Problem Hurting Hillary Clinton Archived October 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine., National Journal, August 19, 2015.
190.Jump up ^ Levine, Mike (August 2, 2016). "What FBI Director Really Said About Clinton Email Probe". ABC.
191.Jump up ^ Zapotosky, Matt (July 7, 2016). "House Republicans grill FBI director Comey on Clinton emails". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 7, 2016.
192.Jump up ^ Alexandra Jaffe and Dan Merica, CNN (March 10, 2015). "Hillary Clinton email scandal does damage control – CNN". CNN. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
193.Jump up ^ "Clinton: It 'might have been smarter' to use a State Dept. e-mail account". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
194.^ Jump up to: a b "Source: Clinton used iPad for personal email at State". CNN. March 31, 2015. Retrieved August 16, 2015.
195.Jump up ^ "First Take: Clinton's even tone edges into exasperation". USA Today. March 11, 2015. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
196.Jump up ^ "State Department found 4 emails about drones sent by Clinton". Associated Press. Retrieved August 16, 2015.
197.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton actually used two devices while secretary of state, records show". The Independent. Retrieved August 16, 2015.
198.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton also used an iPad for e-mails, undercutting her single-device defense". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 16, 2015.
199.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton tries to end controversy over private email account". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 1, 2015. "she disclosed that her aides had deleted more than 30,000 emails that she deemed personal....Clinton said that when she and her staff reviewed the emails last year, she instructed her lawyer to err on the side of turning over anything that might be considered work-related."
200.Jump up ^ Josh Gerstein and Joseph Marks (October 1, 2015). "Most Clinton Spam Messages Likely Deleted". Politico. "[A]ccording to little-noticed language in a statement Clinton's office issued earlier this year....'After her work-related emails were identified and preserved, Secretary Clinton chose not to keep her private, personal messages....'"
201.Jump up ^ Michael S. Schmidt, Justice Dept. Says Hillary Clinton Had Authority to Delete Certain Emails, The New York Times, September 11, 2015.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,417 Posts
81.Jump up ^ "Hackers linked to Russia tried to infiltrate Hillary Clinton's emails", CBS News (September 30, 2015): "these messages show hackers had Clinton's email address, which was not public...."
82.Jump up ^ Gerstein, Josh. "Why Clinton’s email problems are here to stay", Politico, May 25, 2016.
83.Jump up ^ Ken Dilanian; Jack Gillum. "Sources of attempts to hack Clinton's e-mail server ID'd". Retrieved February 21, 2016.
84.Jump up ^ "Clinton subject to hack attempts from China, Korea, Germany". Associated Press.
85.^ Jump up to: a b Apuzzo, Matt (March 3, 2016). "Security Logs of Hillary Clinton's Email Server Are Said to Show No Evidence of Hacking". The New York Times. Retrieved March 6, 2016.
86.Jump up ^ Marks, Joseph (October 28, 2015). "Debate fact check: No evidence Clinton's server was hacked". 'Politico. Retrieved March 2, 2016.
87.Jump up ^ "Hacker Begins Distributing Confidential Memos Sent To Hillary Clinton On Libya, Benghazi Attack". The Smoking Gun. March 18, 2013. Retrieved March 20, 2013.
88.Jump up ^ "Private Emails Reveal Ex-Clinton Aide's Secret Spy Network". ProPublica. March 27, 2015. Retrieved June 11, 2016.
89.Jump up ^ "Hacker 'Guccifer' extradited from Romania, appears in U.S. court". Reuters. April 1, 2016. Retrieved June 11, 2016.
90.Jump up ^ Catherine Herridge & Pamela K. Browne. Hacker who claims he breached Clinton server pleads guilty, strikes deal with feds, Fox News (May 25, 2016).
91.Jump up ^ Hosenball, Mark. "Hacker who exposed Hillary Clinton's email server expected to plead guilty", Reuters.com, May 24, 2016.
92.Jump up ^ "US Judge: Clinton May Be Ordered to Testify in Records Case". Associated Press. May 4, 2016. Retrieved November 14, 2016.
93.Jump up ^ Zapotosky, Matt (May 5, 2016). "Officials: Scant evidence that Clinton had malicious intent in handling of emails". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 6, 2016.
94.Jump up ^ Cynthia McFadden. "Hacker 'Guccifer': I Got Inside Hillary Clinton's Server". NBC News.
95.Jump up ^ Catherine Herridge, Pamela K. Browne. "Romanian hacker Guccifer: I breached Clinton server, 'it was easy'". Fox News Channel.
96.Jump up ^ Zapotosky, Matt (July 7, 2016). "House Republicans grill FBI director Comey on Clinton emails". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 13, 2016.
97.^ Jump up to: a b "Hillary Clinton Email Targeted by Threat Group-4127". secureworks.com. Retrieved 2017-10-12.
98.^ Jump up to: a b "The FBI Files on Clinton's Emails - FactCheck.org". September 7, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2018.
99.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules". Retrieved August 30, 2018.
100.Jump up ^ "F.B.I. Papers Offer Closer Look at Hillary Clinton Email Inquiry". Retrieved August 30, 2018.
101.Jump up ^ "Trump, Pence 'Acid Wash' Facts - FactCheck.org". September 8, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2018.
102.Jump up ^ Factbase. "Donald Trump Complete - Search Tweets, Speeches, Policies - Factbase". Factbase. Retrieved August 30, 2018.
103.Jump up ^ Factbase. "Donald Trump Complete - Search Tweets, Speeches, Policies - Factbase". Factbase. Retrieved August 30, 2018.
104.^ Jump up to: a b c d e Allen, Jonathan (August 21, 2015). "Exclusive: Dozens of Clinton emails were classified from the start, U.S. rules suggest". Reuters. Retrieved August 28, 2015.
105.Jump up ^ Staff (July 5, 2016). "FBI recommends no charges against Hillary Clinton over emails". BBC News. Retrieved November 14, 2016. "But investigators found that a number of messages that were marked classified at the time were sent from her account."
106.Jump up ^ Herridge, Catherine; Browne, Pamela K. (June 11, 2016). "Despite Clinton claims, 2012 email had classified marking". Fox News Channel. Retrieved June 13, 2016.
107.Jump up ^ Carroll, Lauren (July 5, 2016). "FBI investigation undermines Clinton email defense". PolitiFact. Retrieved July 5, 2016.
108.Jump up ^ Cillizza, Chris (July 5, 2016). "Hillary Clinton's email problems might be even worse than we thought". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 5, 2016.
109.Jump up ^ "What FBI Director James Comey Really Said About Hillary Clinton Email Probe". ABC News. August 2, 2016. Retrieved September 7, 2016.
110.Jump up ^ "Clinton not technically sophisticated: FBI interview". CNBC. Retrieved September 7, 2016.
111.Jump up ^ Kiely, Eugene (July 7, 2016). "Revisiting Clinton and Classified Information". Factcheck.org. Retrieved July 22, 2016.
112.^ Jump up to: a b Helderman, Rosalind S.; Hamburger, Tom (March 5, 2016). "Clinton, on her private server, wrote 104 emails the government says are classified". Retrieved April 21, 2018 – via www.washingtonpost.com.
113.Jump up ^ "FBI tears holes in Hillary Clinton's email defense". Retrieved April 21, 2018.
114.Jump up ^ "The GOP's opening over Hillary Clinton's email". Retrieved April 21, 2018.
115.Jump up ^ Rosalind S. Helderman (March 5, 2016). "Clinton, on her private server, wrote 104 emails the government says are classified". The Washington Post.
116.Jump up ^ "Last Batch of Hillary Clinton's Emails Is Released". The New York Times. March 1, 2016.
117.Jump up ^ Klapper, Bradley; Lee, Matthew (February 29, 2016). "State Dept completes Clinton email release, more than 52k out including 2,100 with info now deemed classified". U.S. News and World Report. Retrieved March 1, 2016.
118.^ Jump up to: a b Labott, Elise."Clinton emails Included Classified Information", CNN, July 24, 2015.
119.^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g Michael S. Schmidt; Matt Apuzzo (July 24, 2015). "Hillary Clinton Emails Said to Contain Classified Data". The New York Times. Retrieved July 25, 2015.
120.^ Jump up to: a b c Byron Tau, Hillary Clinton Sent Classified Information Over Email While at State Department, The Wall Street Journal, July 24, 2015.
121.^ Jump up to: a b c d e Bradley Klapper; Ken Dilanian (August 14, 2015). "Top secret Clinton emails include drone talk". AP Big Story. Associated Press. Retrieved August 19, 2015. "part of a covert program that is widely known and discussed"
122.Jump up ^ "US State Department 'Top secret' emails on Clinton server discussed drone program, reference classified info". Fox News Channel. Associated Press. August 14, 2015. Retrieved August 24, 2015.
123.Jump up ^ "Agencies Battle Over What Is 'Top Secret' in Hillary Clinton's Emails". February 5, 2016. Retrieved April 21, 2018 – via NYTimes.com.
124.Jump up ^ Schmidt, Michael S. "Second Review Says Classified Information Was in Hillary Clinton's Email" The New York Times, September 7, 2015.
125.Jump up ^ Mazzetti, Mark (January 19, 2016). "Hillary Clinton Email Said to Include Material Exceeding 'Top Secret'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 20, 2016.
126.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton Emails Held Info Beyond Top Secret: IG". NBC News. Retrieved January 20, 2016.
127.Jump up ^ Helderman, Rosalind S.; Hamburger, Tom (January 19, 2016). "Intelligence community watchdog reconfirms that dozens of Clinton emails were classified". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved January 20, 2016.
128.Jump up ^ Byron Tau (January 29, 2016). "State Department: 22 of Hillary Clinton's Emails Considered Too Classified to Release". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 1, 2016.
129.^ Jump up to: a b Jose Pagliery, Deirdre Walsh and Elise Labott. "State Department: Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice staffers received classified info via personal email". CNN. Retrieved February 9, 2016.
130.Jump up ^ Linick, Steve (February 3, 2016). "Memorandum for Under Secretary Kennedy" (PDF).
131.Jump up ^ "Other Secretaries Handled Classified Material on Private Email, State Dept. Concludes". ABC News.
132.Jump up ^ "Fact-checking Chuck Schumer's defense of Hillary Clinton's private email". PolitiFact. Retrieved February 10, 2016.
133.Jump up ^ "House GOP split over Clinton email probe". Politico. Retrieved November 4, 2015.
134.Jump up ^ "From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Clinton-Scandal Primer". David A. Graham. June 10, 2016. Retrieved June 14, 2016.
135.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton's file". Politifact.com. Retrieved June 14, 2016.
136.Jump up ^ Justin Fishel & Mike Levine, Hillary Clinton Emails: Your Questions Answered, ABC News, August 12, 2015.
137.Jump up ^ Anita Kumar, Marisa Taylor & Greg Gordon, "Top Secret' emails Found as Clinton Probe Expands to Key Aides, McClatchy Washington Bureau, August 11, 2015.
138.Jump up ^ Sacks, Mike (August 18, 2015). "Clinton Lawyer Informs Congress About Security Clearance, Email Safeguards". National Law Journal. Retrieved September 19, 2015.
139.Jump up ^ Jason Donner (August 20, 2015). "Judge orders State Dept. to work on recovering emails, suggests Clinton violated policy". Fox News Channel. Retrieved August 27, 2015.
140.Jump up ^ Schmidt, Michael (August 20, 2015). "Judge Says Hillary Clinton Didn't Follow Government Email Policies". NYT. Retrieved August 27, 2015.
141.Jump up ^ Gerstein, Josh (August 20, 2015). "Judge says Hillary Clinton's private emails violated policy". Politico. Retrieved August 28, 2015.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,417 Posts
Really? Wikipedia again? Who can edit Wikipedia? Anyone. Who can add to Wikipedia? Anyone. That is why it's not allowed as a reference in most colleges from "educated" people.

You tell me to "educate myself instead of relying on right wing disinformation" while you blindly believe the pablum being being spoon fed by the left. Does is not seem just a little strange that only one station reports other facts which the mainstream media ignores, twists or just lies about?
Anyone can write what they want in a Wikipedia article?

Actually whoever told you that is wrong.

Here is the total list of references to that Hillary article and edited by Wikipedia editors to remove non referenced made up crap to validate the information as clearly as they can.

Notice the references include both sides of the spectrum.

Again why not educate yourself and stop watching the far right wing BS "news" source called Fox News Channel. It mightl do you a World of good to become informed with facts instead of with fiction.


"References


1. "Don't blame the election on fake news. Blame it on the media". Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
2.^ Jump up to: a b "News Coverage of the 2016 National Conventions: Negative News, Lacking Context". Shorenstein Center. 2016-09-21. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
3.^ Jump up to: a b "Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election | Berkman Klein Center". cyber.harvard.edu. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
4.Jump up ^ "AP Exclusive: Top secret Clinton emails include drone talk". Retrieved April 21, 2018.
5.^ Jump up to: a b "Officials: New Top Secret Clinton Emails 'Innocuous'". Retrieved April 21, 2018.
6.^ Jump up to: a b Halper, Brian Bennett, Evan. "What you need to know about Hillary Clinton's emails". latimes.com. Retrieved April 21, 2018.
7.Jump up ^ Schallhorn, Kaitlyn (April 17, 2018). "Trump's nicknames for rivals, from 'Rocket Man' to 'Pocahontas'". Fox News. Retrieved April 21, 2018.
8.Jump up ^ Schouten, Fredreka, Kevin Johnson & Heidi Przybyla (November 6, 2016). "FBI declares it is finally done investigating Hillary Clinton's email". USA Today.
9.Jump up ^ "Will Comey survive the Clinton email flap?". Politico. Retrieved 2018-04-18.
10.Jump up ^ "Fact-check: Comey didn't say he reopened Clinton investigation because of poll numbers". Politico. Retrieved 2018-04-18.
11.^ Jump up to: a b "Highlights of DOJ inspector general report on handling of Clinton email probe". CBS News. June 14, 2018. Retrieved 2018-06-15.
12.Jump up ^ "How Clinton's email scandal took root". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 6, 2016.
13.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Dept. Review". The New York Times. May 26, 2016. Retrieved July 6, 2016.
14.Jump up ^ "Not 'allowed': Clinton's email talk misses the mark". politifact.com. Retrieved July 6, 2016.
15.^ Jump up to: a b "NSA Refused Clinton a Secure Phone, She Set Up Private Server Instead". lawnewz.com. Retrieved July 6, 2016.
16.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton Wasn't Adept at Using a Desktop for Email, Inquiry Is Told". The New York Times. May 27, 2016. Retrieved July 6, 2016.
17.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton: Private email set up for 'convenience'". BBC. Retrieved July 6, 2016.
18.Jump up ^ "Revealed: Clinton's office was warned over private email use". Retrieved July 6, 2016.
19.^ Jump up to: a b c Robert O'Harrow Jr. (March 27, 2016). "How Clinton's email scandal took root". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 28, 2016. "The issue here is one of personal comfort", one of the participants in that meeting, Donald Reid, the department's senior coordinator for security infrastructure, wrote afterward in an email that described Clinton's inner circle of advisers as "dedicated [BlackBerry] addicts"...."Her attention was drawn to the sentence that indicates (Diplomatic Security) have intelligence concerning this vulnerability during her recent trip to Asia...."
20.Jump up ^ Meghan Keneally (March 5, 2015). "Hillary Clinton Email Mystery Man: What We Know About Eric Hoteham". ABC News. Retrieved March 19, 2015. (The name Eric Hoteham is similar to that of Eric Hothem, a former Clinton aide.)
21.Jump up ^ "Who Is Eric Hoteham? Clinton Private Server Listed Under Mysterious, Untraceable Name". Washington.cbslocal.com. March 4, 2015. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
22.Jump up ^ Sick, Gary (March 9, 2015). "5 questions: The Clinton email". Politico.com. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
23.^ Jump up to: a b c Scott Shane; Michael S. Schmidt (August 8, 2015). "Hillary Clinton Emails Take Long Path to Controversy". The New York Times. Retrieved August 8, 2015.
24.^ Jump up to: a b Eric Tucker, "Clinton Aides Agree to Preserve Emails after Judge's Order", Associated Press, August 13, 2015.
25.Jump up ^ Natasha Bertrand, "VP of Cybersecurity Firm Hired by Hillary Clinton: 'We would never have taken it on' if we knew of the ensuing chaos", Business Insider, August 19, 2015.
26.Jump up ^ Tom Hamburger; Karen Tumulty (August 12, 2015). "Hillary Clinton's e-mail server turned over to FBI". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 14, 2015.
27.Jump up ^ Labott, Elise (August 11, 2015). "Hillary Clinton to turn over private email server to Justice Department". CNN. Retrieved August 12, 2015.
28.^ Jump up to: a b Dilanian, Ken (August 11, 2015). "Clinton relents, gives up possession of private email server". Associated Press.
29.Jump up ^ "Update: Clinton's e-mail is on a hosted Exchange 2010 server, not in Chappaqua". Retrieved July 6, 2016.
30.Jump up ^ "Outlook Web App". mail.clintonemail.com. Retrieved July 6, 2016.
31.Jump up ^ Gerstein, Josh (March 6, 2015). "Clinton private email violated 'clear-cut' State Dept. rules". Politico.com. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
32.^ Jump up to: a b O'Harrow Jr., Robert. "How Clinton's email scandal took root", The Washington Post'', March 27, 2016.
33.^ Jump up to: a b "Hacker Begins Distributing Confidential Memos Sent To Hillary Clinton On Libya, Benghazi Attack". The Smoking Gun. March 18, 2013. Retrieved September 30, 2015.
34.^ Jump up to: a b Cook, John (March 20, 2013). "Hacked Emails Show Hillary Clinton Was Receiving Advice at a Private Email Account From Banned, Obama-Hating Former Staffer". Gawker. Archived from the original on October 1, 2015. Retrieved September 30, 2015.
35.^ Jump up to: a b Acohido, Byron (March 22, 2013). "'Guccifer' hacks Hillary Clinton's e-emails via aide's account". USA Today. Retrieved September 30, 2015.
36.Jump up ^ Gerstein, Josh. "Clinton's emails from Blumenthal spark tension", Politico (October 22, 2015): "At least one has been deemed classified by State, including information Clinton sent to Blumenthal, who had no security clearance."
37.Jump up ^ Morrison, Micah. "Hillary Clinton's rogue agenda: Why Sid Blumenthal matters", New York Post, October 31, 2015; "The November 2009 e-mail was sent by Wilson to Blumenthal, who passed it on to Clinton. Most of Clinton's reply to Blumenthal is redacted as classified."
38.Jump up ^ Tom Hamburger; Rosalind S. Helderman (October 7, 2015). "FBI probe of Clinton e-mail expands to second data company". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 7, 2015.
39.Jump up ^ Emery, Eugene. "Hillary Clinton spins on ‘Meet the Press,’ says she put out all her emails", Politifact (April 3, 2016).
40.^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g Domenico Montanaro, Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails and the Law, NPR (April 2, 2015).
41.^ Jump up to: a b c Michael S. Schmidt, Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules, The New York Times, March 2, 2015.
42.Jump up ^ Jack Gillum - "H illary Clinton used private server for official email", Associated Press, March 4, 2015. Retrieved November 14, 2016.
43.Jump up ^ Schmidt, Michael S. (March 5, 2015). "Hillary Clinton Asks State Department to Vet Emails for Release". The New York Times. Retrieved November 5, 2015.
44.Jump up ^ Zurcher, Anthony (March 11, 2015). "Hillary Clinton's 'emailgate' diced and sliced". BBC News. Archived from the original on March 12, 2015.
45.Jump up ^ Eichenwald, Kurt (March 3, 2015). "Why Hillary Clinton's 'Emailgate' Is a Fake Scandal". Newsweek. Archived from the original on March 10, 2015.
46.Jump up ^ Hartmann, Margaret (August 21, 2015). "Could Hillary Clinton Face Criminal Charges Over Emailgate?". New York. Archived from the original on November 3, 2016.
47.^ Jump up to: a b "Hillary Clinton's use of private email not unusual, but still raises questions". Los Angeles Times. March 3, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
48.Jump up ^ "Howard Dean: 'Tremendous' number of public officials have done what Hillary Clinton did with email". @politifact. Retrieved February 9, 2016.
49.Jump up ^ "Hillary's Email Defense Is Laughable". Politico.com. Retrieved February 9, 2016.
50.Jump up ^ Bob Cusack; Molly K. Hooper (March 26, 2015). "The Hillary backer who will pose problems for her 2016 bid". The Hill.
51.Jump up ^ Merica, Dan.Report via CNN Tweet (March 3, 2015), "Jason Baron, former head of litigation at the NARA, says Clinton didn't 'violate' the law. 'The Federal Records Act is amorphous enough.'"
52.Jump up ^ Seitz-Wald, Alex (March 4, 2015). "Hillary Clinton's email problem is not going away". MSNBC. Retrieved May 24, 2015.
53.Jump up ^ Eugene Kiely (September 8, 2015). "More Spin on Clinton Emails". FactCheck.org.
54.^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h Helderman, Rosalind and Hamburger, Tom. State Dept. inspector general report sharply criticizes Clinton's email practices, The Washington Post, May 25, 2016.



Continued:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,417 Posts
58.Jump up ^ Lerer, Lisa; Lucy, Catherine. "[1]". Associated Press. Public Broadcasting System. May 31, 2016.
59.Jump up ^ Carroll, Lauren. "Fact-checking Hillary Clinton's claim that her email practices were 'allowed'", Polifact, May 31, 2016.
60.Jump up ^ "Report on Clinton's Emails, FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center. University of Pennsylvania. May 27, 2016 Kiely, Eugene". factcheck.org. Retrieved July 12, 2017.[permanent dead link]
61.Jump up ^ Browne, Ryan and Evan Perez. “State Department report slams Clinton email use”, CNN, May 25, 2016: "while the report acknowledges personal email use by previous secretaries, it also notes that the rules for preserving work emails sent from a personal email account were updated in 2009, the year Clinton took office".
62.Jump up ^ Andrew Prokop (May 25, 2016). "What the new inspector general report on Hillary Clinton's emails actually says". Vox.
63.Jump up ^ Douglas Cox (May 26, 2016). "Hillary Clinton's shrinking email defense". CNN.
64.Jump up ^ "State Department Inspector General Finds Hillary Clinton Violated Recordkeeping Rules". Mother Jones.
65.Jump up ^ "Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Dept. Review". The New York Times. May 26, 2016.
55.Jump up ^ Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements, Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of State and Broadcasting Board of Governors (May 2016) (republished by The Washington Post).
56.Jump up ^ Morello, Carol and Yang, Jia. Here are the most critical parts of the State Department inspector general report on Clinton’s email use, The Washington Post, May 25, 2016.
57.Jump up ^ Dilanian, Ken. "Clinton Broke Federal Rules With Email Server, Audit Finds", NBC News, May 25, 2016.
 
1 - 20 of 141 Posts
Top