Expat Forum For People Moving Overseas And Living Abroad

Expat Forum For People Moving Overseas And Living Abroad (https://www.expatforum.com/expats/)
-   La Chatarrera (https://www.expatforum.com/expats/la-chatarrer/)
-   -   CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC More Trump (https://www.expatforum.com/expats/la-chatarrer/1377002-more-trump.html)

Prowler 19th December 2019 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by surabi (Post 15011698)
Thank you for proving my point.

All you have proven is that when your own words are pointed at your party they suddenly don't matter. Trump talked about it, Bill Clinton actually did it in the white house then tried to lie about to the nation. But that telltale stain on Monica`'s dress was his undoing. Obama had children in cages for 8 years and the media knew it but used the left as pawns to outrage them at what has been happening the entire time under their watch.

Do you really not understand that you are being played like a fiddle by the media?

baldilocks 19th December 2019 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prowler (Post 15012036)
All you have proven is that when your own words are pointed at your party they suddenly don't matter. Trump talked about it, Bill Clinton actually did it in the white house then tried to lie about to the nation. But that telltale stain on Monica`'s dress was his undoing. Obama had children in cages for 8 years and the media knew it but used the left as pawns to outrage them at what has been happening the entire time under their watch.

Do you really not understand that you are being played like a fiddle by the media?

Just like you are but by different media.

Prowler 21st December 2019 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baldilocks (Post 15012040)
Just like you are but by different media.

Funny that all of the other news stations all say the same thing, and repeat lies while only one tells another side to the story.

90% of what we watch, listen to and read is owned by 6 companies. That’s a large percentage to just be divided by a factor of six. 30 years ago 90% of media was held by 50 different companies,which is what most people would assume it would be now, but thanks to mergers and buyouts, it’s down to 6 major companies (until someone else buys another). The reason we never find anything new on TV is that 70% of what is on cable is owned by the ‘Big 6.’

Back to the impeachment, after weeks of putting this in the news the democrats are now afraid to forward their impeachment process to the senate as they know it will die faster than a witness against the Clintons. All for nothing but to pander to their voter base.

baldilocks 21st December 2019 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prowler (Post 15012700)
Funny that all of the other news stations all say the same thing, and repeat lies while only one tells another side to the story.

90% of what we watch, listen to and read is owned by 6 companies. That’s a large percentage to just be divided by a factor of six. 30 years ago 90% of media was held by 50 different companies,which is what most people would assume it would be now, but thanks to mergers and buyouts, it’s down to 6 major companies (until someone else buys another). The reason we never find anything new on TV is that 70% of what is on cable is owned by the ‘Big 6.’

Back to the impeachment, after weeks of putting this in the news the democrats are now afraid to forward their impeachment process to the senate as they know it will die faster than a witness against the Clintons. All for nothing but to pander to their voter base.

Are you suggesting that they should not be acting as their electorate wishes? Perhaps you would prefer the other side's attitude that they just do what big business wants and ignore their voters.[cut]

Prowler 22nd December 2019 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baldilocks (Post 15012724)
Are you suggesting that they should not be acting as their electorate wishes? Perhaps you would prefer the other side's attitude that they just do what big business wants and ignore their voters. [Cut].

Acting as their electorate wishes? You mean rushing to judgement considering a person guilty instead of innocent then just stallling?

As Mitch McConnell said, ¨In a highly unusual step, the Speaker of the House continues to hem and haw about whether and when she intends to take the normal next step and transmit the House’s accusations to the Senate.

So we have this fascinating situation where, following House Democrats’ rush to impeachment, following weeks of pronouncements about the urgency of this situation, the prosecutors have now developed cold feet.¨

Is this what their electorate wishes? To go through the motions and then just stop short of presenting their no evidence case? No, their electorate want the president impeached, not this nonsensical display of incompetence.

I see from your comment that it is now fine to call anyone who does not agree with you names.

TundraGreen 22nd December 2019 02:24 PM

Enough already.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.